NKN(NKN)

Tokens on the platform were moved to an "unknown, external address" last week while its team members were under detention.

Shiba SHIB has charted some notable loss in the past weeks and has continued to appear weak by the day. It recently initiated a drop, but the gravity is yet unknown if the price will go through or not. Despite a series of lower highs in the past weeks, Shiba […]

In the world of cryptocurrency, where things can change quickly and there’s both risk and opportunity, Ripple (XRP) is dealing with internal decisions and external unknowns. Meanwhile, Optimism (OP) is riding the wave of broad approval. In this ever-changing environment, a new player called Kelexo (KLXO) has entered with plans […]

Anonymous wallet spends $66,000 to inscribe data on the Bitcoin blockchain; the owner remains unknown.

Litecoin has been relatively calm for three days following a sharp rejection from a four-month dip in the mid-week. The price is down by 10% weekly, but whether it will continue to drop is unknown yet.  After testing a multi-month high of $79.69 last December, Litecoin exhausted buying pressure and […]

Amid investigations into a security breach on Catalyx, it remains unknown how much was stolen from the platform.

Canadian crypto exchange Catalyx has stopped accepting withdrawals and halted all trading activities on its platform after a security issue resulted in the loss of an unknown amount of user funds.

The Canadian exchange suffered a security break earlier this month, resulting in the loss of an unknown amount of customer funds.

An unknown bad actor is currently offering access to Binance’s platform for serving law enforcement officers’ requests.

The unknown seed investor agreed to purchase $100,000 shares on October 27, 2023, BlackRock’s latest filing reveals.

An unknown entity has bought 11,268 bitcoin [BTC] worth $424 million since November 10 in what appears to be a time-weight average price (TWAP) accumulation strategy.

One whale transferred over $31 million worth of SHIB to an unknown wallet on October 11.

"Remember to do your research, stay informed, and always be cautious when connecting your wallet to unknown Dapps," the team urged.

While Cryptoqueen's whereabouts remain unknown, more OneCoin former executives are serving prison sentences.

In a rare incident that has left the Bitcoin community astounded, an unknown user executed a transaction on September 10 that has quickly become the talk of the crypto community.

Ripple made a serious step toward acquiring Fortess and although there are some unknowns, it seems like a big deal.

An unknown wallet has accrued more than $3 billion worth of Bitcoin in the last three months, sparking a wave of theories about the potential owner.

Elon Musk revealed that SpaceX holds Bitcoin on its balance sheet in 2021 but the exact amount of company's holdings remain unknown.

Republican members of the House Financial Services Committee are demanding that SEC Chair Gary Gensler explain how Prometheum got approval from the SEC. The lawmakers have petitioned both financial regulators for more information regarding the company’s registration status. Republicans Demand Answers The Republican lawmakers on the Financial Services Committee, led by Chairman Patrick McHenry, have questioned how the previously unknown entity was able to beat other, more established entities to obtain approval from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a broker-dealer for crypto. The members have directed their inquiries to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in a letter signed by 23 House Financial Services Lawmakers. Several questions have been raised regarding the context of Prometheum’s approval, especially since the approval came shortly after a joint hearing held by the House Financial Committee and the House Agriculture Committee on digital assets. The letter stated, “The timing of the approval raises concerns that it was aimed at demonstrating that legislation is not needed because there is a workable regulatory framework for the custody of digital asset securities.”’ A Play By Gensler? The letter has also flagged serious concerns about whether the Securities and Exchange Commission put Prometheum up as a poster firm to shore up SEC Chair Cary Gensler’s argument that no new laws were required to regulate the crypto space in the United States. The approval comes just before McHenry’s committee is about to send the digital assets legislation to the house floor. However, Prometheum executives have insisted there is nothing to be surprised about regarding the approval. They added that they followed the registration process step-by-step, just like other firms looking for approval. Prometheum’s co-CEO, Aaron Kaplan, has also insisted that the firm would go about demonstrating the right way to build a crypto platform that is also fully compliant with current laws and regulations. In response to the letter, the company released a statement, responding, “Prometheum purpose-built its technology with the goal to develop a market infrastructure for digital asset securities that is compliant with the federal securities laws. This technology will serve as a building block for a compliant and orderly digital asset securities marketplace that protects investors and serves their best interests.” Lawmakers Wary Of Prometheum The Republican lawmakers are the latest to call for more information and an investigation into the sudden approval of Prometheum, a company that has not done any trading as yet. Several other Republican members of the Senate have called for greater scrutiny of the prevailing situation. Republican lawmaker Thomas Tuberville has alleged that the company may have provided false testimony to Congress or violated several US Securities Laws. Meanwhile, Democrat lawmaker Ritchie Torres has requested an investigation of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Prometheum’s China Connection Prometheum has previously collaborated with the Shanghai Wanxiang Blockchain Inc. to develop a blockchain trading software, a point that has been noted by lawmakers. While the collaboration has been concluded, reports have highlighted the involvement of a Chinese firm during Prometheum’s early days. According to several reports, a Chinese entity owns a portion of the company and even has a representative, Feng Ziao, as a director at Prometheum. Lawmakers have also pointed to the connection between Wanxiang and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which has led to significant concerns about national security and data privacy. Furthermore, Kaplan’s posts on social media have also garnered considerable attention. Kaplan’s views closely align with that of the Securities and Exchange Commission and differ from those taken by crypto-space members. Kaplan has insisted that existing Federal Securities Laws are sufficient to regulate crypto. Kaplan and other top executives at Prometheum’s connections with the Securities and Exchange Commission and FINRA have also been discussed. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Republican members of the House Financial Services Committee are demanding that SEC Chair Gary Gensler explain how Prometheum got approval from the SEC. The lawmakers have petitioned both financial regulators for more information regarding the company’s registration status. Republicans Demand Answers The Republican lawmakers on the Financial Services Committee, led by Chairman Patrick McHenry, have questioned how the previously unknown entity was able to beat other, more established entities to obtain approval from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a broker-dealer for crypto. The members have directed their inquiries to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in a letter signed by 23 House Financial Services Lawmakers. Several questions have been raised regarding the context of Prometheum’s approval, especially since the approval came shortly after a joint hearing held by the House Financial Committee and the House Agriculture Committee on digital assets. The letter stated, “The timing of the approval raises concerns that it was aimed at demonstrating that legislation is not needed because there is a workable regulatory framework for the custody of digital asset securities.”’ A Play By Gensler? The letter has also flagged serious concerns about whether the Securities and Exchange Commission put Prometheum up as a poster firm to shore up SEC Chair Cary Gensler’s argument that no new laws were required to regulate the crypto space in the United States. The approval comes just before McHenry’s committee is about to send the digital assets legislation to the house floor. However, Prometheum executives have insisted there is nothing to be surprised about regarding the approval. They added that they followed the registration process step-by-step, just like other firms looking for approval. Prometheum’s co-CEO, Aaron Kaplan, has also insisted that the firm would go about demonstrating the right way to build a crypto platform that is also fully compliant with current laws and regulations. In response to the letter, the company released a statement, responding, “Prometheum purpose-built its technology with the goal to develop a market infrastructure for digital asset securities that is compliant with the federal securities laws. This technology will serve as a building block for a compliant and orderly digital asset securities marketplace that protects investors and serves their best interests.” Lawmakers Wary Of Prometheum The Republican lawmakers are the latest to call for more information and an investigation into the sudden approval of Prometheum, a company that has not done any trading as yet. Several other Republican members of the Senate have called for greater scrutiny of the prevailing situation. Republican lawmaker Thomas Tuberville has alleged that the company may have provided false testimony to Congress or violated several US Securities Laws. Meanwhile, Democrat lawmaker Ritchie Torres has requested an investigation of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Prometheum’s China Connection Prometheum has previously collaborated with the Shanghai Wanxiang Blockchain Inc. to develop a blockchain trading software, a point that has been noted by lawmakers. While the collaboration has been concluded, reports have highlighted the involvement of a Chinese firm during Prometheum’s early days. According to several reports, a Chinese entity owns a portion of the company and even has a representative, Feng Ziao, as a director at Prometheum. Lawmakers have also pointed to the connection between Wanxiang and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which has led to significant concerns about national security and data privacy. Furthermore, Kaplan’s posts on social media have also garnered considerable attention. Kaplan’s views closely align with that of the Securities and Exchange Commission and differ from those taken by crypto-space members. Kaplan has insisted that existing Federal Securities Laws are sufficient to regulate crypto. Kaplan and other top executives at Prometheum’s connections with the Securities and Exchange Commission and FINRA have also been discussed. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

There are still too many unknowns over how various Telegram trading bots store private keys, blockchain security firms told Cointelegraph.

Crypto enthusiasts have lauded Joe Biden’s latest social media post for its so-called accidental endorsement of Bitcoin.

NFT mystery boxes are curated collections of unknown digital assets, offering buyers the excitement of discovering the contents after purchase.

A deep dive into global employment data and trends indicates that AI could have the biggest impact on high-skill jobs.