Clarity Act Faces Final Senate Push

Ethics Language Remains the Central Fight

Democratic support is the main bottleneck because the Senate version cannot advance on Republican votes alone. Legislative staffers signaled that the latest effort still has not secured the Democratic buy-in it needs, even though new language was added to respond to Democratic concerns.

Even the two Democrats who supported advancing the Banking Committee’s version reportedly warned that they may not support the final bill if unresolved issues are not addressed. The most politically sensitive issue is whether the bill will include ethics restrictions limiting the ability of presidents, vice presidents, members of Congress and other federal officials to profit from digital assets while in office.

Several lawmakers have said they will not support the Clarity Act without ethics language. Negotiators from both parties have spent months discussing restrictions, but the latest draft still had not settled the matter. One ethics idea discussed in negotiations would allow state attorneys general to sue over ethics violations, though progress on a broader compromise was characterized as slow.

The ethics debate is sharpened by President Donald Trump’s crypto-related financial disclosures and his family’s crypto venture, World Liberty Financial. The Office of Government Ethics released Trump’s financial disclosure report in June 2026, and the disclosure showed hundreds of billions of dollars in bitcoin and ethereum tied to World Liberty Financial.

A group of Democratic senators, including Sens. Ron Wyden and Elizabeth Warren, released a joint statement on Friday, July 10, 2026, saying Trump’s disclosures “heighten concerns” about the president pushing Congress to pass crypto legislation while benefiting from the industry. The senators also raised concerns about the administration exempting cryptocurrencies and service providers from existing financial-services regulations and weakening enforcement, including by disbanding the Department of Justice’s National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team.

House Financial Services Committee Chair French Hill, R-Ark., argued on Friday morning that many concerns around memecoin issuance, coinvestment, exchange use and exchange investments would already sit under a regulated market framework if the Clarity Act had passed the previous summer. Hill said a market framework would bring regulation and “clarity, no pun intended,” especially for people worried about Trump family crypto investments.

We’ve launched the all-new COIN360 Perp DEX, built for traders who move fast!

Trade 130+ assets with up to 100× leverage, enjoy instant order placement and low-slippage swaps, and earn USDC passive yield while climbing the leaderboard. Your trades deserve more than speed — they deserve mastery.

Developer Protections and Consumer Language Shape the Draft

The merged Senate draft is expected to combine work from the Banking and Agriculture Committees, but it will not be a simple cut-and-paste merger because members negotiated over unresolved provisions after the committee votes. The Agriculture Committee’s earlier version appears to need more negotiation because it passed committee on strictly partisan lines.

More than 70 pages of additional bill language had been added. The new material focused more on consumer protections and was added partly in response to Democratic concerns. The added language was called “pro-consumer,” though the place of ethics provisions in the expanded text remained uncertain.

The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act provision is another major unresolved issue. The provision would protect non-custodial crypto developers from being treated as money transmitters under federal rules when they are not handling customer assets, and the crypto industry considers the provision critical because it could give software developers legal certainty and reduce pressure for innovation to move offshore.

The decentralized finance sector has made preservation of the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act a top priority in the Clarity negotiations. Sen. Ron Wyden, an original cosponsor of the developer-protection provision, sent a letter to Senate leadership earlier in the week urging lawmakers to preserve that section in any future version of the Clarity Act.

Talks around the developer-protection issue were “moving the right way.” Law enforcement groups and Catholic leaders have warned against the non-custodial developer safe harbor, arguing that it could weaken safeguards against human trafficking and hinder investigations.

Federal preemption remains unresolved, meaning negotiators still need to decide how federal crypto rules would interact with or override state-level authority. Negotiators also still need to address how the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission would be filled.

The White House sent a letter on Thursday, July 9, 2026, to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer saying Democrats had not submitted names for minority roles on the commissions. Democratic senators had previously criticized Trump and Thune in a June 2026 letter for allegedly refusing “in almost every instance” to engage with Democratic leadership on the normal process for filling vacancies on independent agencies.

Calendar Pressure Threatens the Bill’s Path

The Clarity Act is competing with other Senate priorities, including appropriations measures and authorization bills. The National Defense Authorization Act is being watched as a key signal because it is a must-pass bill and could show how available Senate floor votes look in July for other legislation.

Whatever happens with the Defense Authorization bill will show how July floor votes are shaping up for every bill, potentially including Clarity. That procedural environment matters because moving a bill through the Senate can consume several days by itself.

The House calendar is another constraint. The House is scheduled to begin its August recess at the end of July, meaning even a successful Senate vote would leave very little time for House approval of the Senate version. The House would need to sign off before the Clarity Act could become law, and the chamber was described as nearly paralyzed by Republican infighting.

President Donald Trump’s handling of another major bill has added uncertainty around his legislative priorities. Congress passed the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, which includes a provision banning the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency.

Trump said as recently as Friday, July 10, 2026, that he would not sign the housing bill until Congress passes separate legislation tightening voting requirements in federal elections. His deadline to act on the housing bill was the end of that Friday; if he did not veto it, the bill would become law.

Blockchain Association Chief Policy Officer Lindsay Fraser said lawmakers should use the Senate’s return to resolve the remaining issues and move the Clarity Act to a floor vote. Fraser said months of bipartisan negotiations had produced a strong foundation and that there was still a path to strong Democratic support once final issues, including ethics provisions, were settled.

The Clarity Act remains active but fragile. Its path depends on a quick draft release, credible ethics language, surviving developer protections, enough Democratic support, available Senate floor time, House approval and Trump’s signature.