Ethereum Foundation Injects 45,000 ETH Into DeFi Amid Governance Scrutiny
![Robot floats in DeFi universe, reaching for Ethereum planets](https://prod-coin360-cms.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/Robot_floats_in_De_Fi_universe_reaching_for_Ethereum_planets_11zon_987f1f0f07.webp)
A Bold Shift in Treasury Management
The Ethereum Foundation has taken a decisive step in reshaping its financial strategy, depositing 45,000 ETH—valued at approximately $120 million—across four major decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. The move signals a major shift from its previous approach of liquidating ETH holdings for operational expenses, a practice that drew sharp criticism from the crypto community.
The deposits were allocated as follows: Aave Core received 20,800 ETH, Spark absorbed 10,000 ETH, Aave Prime was assigned 10,000 ETH, and Compound Finance secured 4,200 ETH. This marks a significant pivot in the foundation’s treasury management, demonstrating a willingness to engage more directly with the DeFi ecosystem rather than maintaining a passive stance.
![Screenshot_6-imageonline.co-merged.png](https://prod-coin360-cms.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/Screenshot_6_imageonline_co_merged_159e33fedd.png)
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin remains the sole decision-maker during the foundation’s ongoing internal restructuring, fueling concerns about centralization in governance. Community frustration had been mounting over the EF’s reluctance to actively stake or manage its holdings within the network, with critics pushing for a more engaged approach to fund management.
Responding to this pressure, the EF previously set up multisig wallets and earmarked 50,000 ETH for a more dynamic investment strategy. The latest DeFi deposits reflect a gradual departure from past hesitations, indicating a potential long-term commitment to decentralized financial infrastructure.
![tweet-1881413731780821405_11zon.jpg](https://prod-coin360-cms.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/tweet_1881413731780821405_11zon_c6ae9505b9.jpg)
Despite this shift, Buterin has voiced concerns about staking on a large scale, citing governance risks and technical constraints. He has warned that staking ETH could compromise the EF’s fork neutrality, potentially forcing it to take sides in contentious network splits. Additionally, the current staking model’s withdrawal restrictions and slashing penalties make it an impractical option for an organization of the EF’s scale, further complicating any full-fledged transition into staking.
Security risks in the DeFi landscape add another layer of complexity to the EF’s strategy. The sector has been rocked by a series of exploits in recent weeks, raising concerns about the safety of assets placed in smart contracts. Liquity V2 recently faced a security scare, prompting users to withdraw funds after a vulnerability was discovered in its Stability Pools.
![tweet-1889685629681934789_11zon.jpg](https://prod-coin360-cms.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/tweet_1889685629681934789_11zon_e80934bdbf.jpg)
Before the alarm was raised, the platform held nearly $85 million in Total Value Locked (TVL), with $68 million still remaining despite warnings. Meanwhile, a $9.5 million exploit struck zkLend, a Starknet-based lending protocol, just a day prior. The attacker was linked to the 2023 EraLend hack, with security firm SlowMist identifying a rounding issue in the withdrawal process as the root cause of the exploit.
Even the DeFi platforms selected by the Ethereum Foundation have experienced security challenges in the past. Aave suffered a $56,000 exploit in August 2023 due to a periphery contract vulnerability. Compound Finance has seen its fair share of turbulence, from a 2022 error that locked $830 million in ETH lending markets for a week to a 2021 mishap that mistakenly distributed $80 million in excess COMP rewards. More recently, Compound DAO was targeted in a governance manipulation attack by a whale investor, highlighting the ongoing risks within the ecosystem.
The EF’s decision to allocate substantial assets to these platforms appears to be a calculated yet defensive maneuver, possibly driven more by public pressure than opportunistic investing. Critics argue that while these DeFi protocols have strong reputations, they remain susceptible to smart contract vulnerabilities, exposing the foundation’s funds to potential security breaches.
Blockchain security firm PeckShield flagged the EF’s sizable transactions, later confirmed by the foundation, underscoring the heightened scrutiny surrounding the move. Whether this marks the beginning of a sustained DeFi strategy or a temporary appeasement of community concerns remains to be seen.
![peckshield tweet.png](https://prod-coin360-cms.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/peckshield_tweet_e964b3db0c.png)
This article has been refined and enhanced by ChatGPT.