Hyperliquid Validators Weigh Governance Vote to Treat $1 Billion in HYPE as Burned Supply

Assistance Fund Vote Could Permanently Exclude 37 Million Tokens From Supply Metrics

TL;DR

• Hyperliquid validators are voting on whether to formally recognize roughly 37.11 million HYPE tokens, worth about $1 billion, as burned and excluded from supply.
• The tokens sit in an Assistance Fund address with no private key, making them inaccessible unless a future protocol upgrade unlocks them.
• A “yes” vote would permanently bind validators to treat the tokens as removed from circulating and total supply, without any on-chain burn.

We’ve just launched the all-new COIN360 Perp DEX, built for traders who move fast!

Trade 130+ assets with up to 100× leverage, enjoy instant order placement and low-slippage swaps, and earn USDC passive yield while climbing the leaderboard. Your trades deserve more than speed — they deserve mastery.

Hyperliquid’s validator set is in the middle of a closely watched governance vote that could permanently alter how the protocol’s token supply is reported, with implications for market perception, valuation models, and long-term token economics. The proposal, put forward by the Hyper Foundation, asks validators to formally recognize all HYPE tokens held in the protocol’s Assistance Fund as effectively burned. Those tokens, estimated at about 37.11 million HYPE with a market value near $1 billion, would be excluded from both circulating supply and total supply figures if the measure passes. While the move has been widely described as a “burn,” no on-chain transaction or token destruction is involved, making the decision largely an accounting and governance commitment rather than a technical change.

Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund is a core part of the protocol’s design. Trading fees generated across the platform are automatically converted into HYPE tokens and routed into a designated system address that has no associated private key. Without a private key, the tokens cannot be moved or spent under current protocol rules. The governance vote seeks to formalize what has already been true in practice: those tokens are inaccessible unless validators someday approve a protocol upgrade that allows them to be unlocked. A “yes” vote would bind validators to never approve such an upgrade, effectively locking the tokens out of the ecosystem for good and aligning reported supply metrics with the protocol’s current behavior.

According to the Hyper Foundation, the intent of the vote is to reduce ambiguity around HYPE’s supply figures and provide clarity for analysts, traders, and institutions tracking the token. The Assistance Fund balance represents roughly 10% to nearly 14% of total HYPE supply, depending on the methodology used, making its classification material for anyone modeling dilution, scarcity, or long-term issuance. Foundation communications describe the proposal as a way to ensure that circulating supply data better reflects tokens that are actually usable in the market, rather than including balances that cannot realistically enter circulation.

The governance process itself follows Hyperliquid’s validator-led model. Validators are required to signal their position by around December 21, with token holders able to express preferences by staking or delegating to validators through December 24. The outcome is determined by stake-weighted consensus rather than a simple headcount. No code changes are scheduled as part of the vote, and no tokens will move on-chain regardless of the result. The decision hinges entirely on social and governance consensus among validators about how the Assistance Fund balance should be treated going forward.

Financial context has added to the significance of the proposal. Research cited by the Foundation indicates Hyperliquid generated roughly $874 million in trading fees during 2025, with about 99% of those fees routed through the Assistance Fund to repurchase HYPE tokens on the open market. This structure has been highlighted by analysts as a mechanism that effectively channels protocol revenue back into the token, reducing circulating supply over time. In parallel, Native Markets, the issuer of Hyperliquid’s USDH stablecoin, has stated that 50% of USDH reserve yield is also directed into the Assistance Fund and converted into HYPE. Should the governance vote pass, those ongoing inflows would likewise be treated as burned for accounting purposes.

Market observers have noted that the vote arrives amid heightened interest in Hyperliquid from both retail traders and institutional desks, many of which rely on standardized supply metrics when assessing token value relative to crypto price indices, broader coin market cap rankings, and peer assets. While the proposal does not alter HYPE’s utility, governance rights, or role within the protocol, it could influence how the token’s scarcity is perceived and how its crypto price is modeled across analytics platforms. Short-term price movements have been relatively muted around the announcement, suggesting traders are still assessing the longer-term implications rather than reacting to an immediate supply shock.

Foundation representatives have emphasized that the vote is not designed to manufacture scarcity or engineer a price response, but to codify an existing reality. By voting “yes,” validators agree to treat the Assistance Fund HYPE as burned and permanently removed from supply calculations, even though the tokens remain visible on-chain. A “no” vote would leave open the possibility, however remote, that a future protocol change could unlock the funds. As the voting window closes, the decision stands to become one of the more consequential governance moments in Hyperliquid’s history, setting a precedent for how decentralized protocols handle large pools of functionally inaccessible tokens in an era where transparency and accurate supply reporting increasingly matter.

This article has been refined and enhanced by ChatGPT.