Trump Media Pulls Crypto ETF Filings

White House separately orders review of crypto firms’ access to Fed payment accounts
TL;DR
- Trump Media-linked crypto ETF filings were withdrawn from SEC review.
- Yorkville America said it plans to pursue products under a different investment-company framework.
- President Donald Trump also ordered regulators to review fintech and crypto access to traditional financial rails.
Trade smarter on Jupiter, Solana’s leading DEX built for fast execution and deep liquidity.
Swap tokens at competitive rates, route across multiple liquidity sources automatically, and access perpetuals, DCA, and advanced trading tools — all in one place!
Trump Media & Technology Group withdrew registration statements for several Truth Social-branded crypto ETFs, while President Donald Trump separately signed an executive order directing federal regulators to review rules that affect digital asset firms’ access to traditional financial services and Federal Reserve payment accounts.
The withdrawn filings covered the Truth Social Bitcoin ETF, Truth Social Bitcoin & Ethereum ETF and proposed Truth Social Crypto Blue Chip ETF. Trump Media & Technology Group told the SEC, “The Company has determined to withdraw the Registration Statement and not to pursue the public offering at this time.” The pullback removed the products from SEC review after the Bitcoin and Bitcoin-Ethereum products were filed in June 2025.
Yorkville America, the sponsor and investment adviser for the Truth Social funds, said the filings were withdrawn under the Securities Act of 1933 because it now plans to pursue investment products under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Steve Neamtz, president of Yorkville America, said the move was intended to give the firm more flexibility for differentiated strategies.
Neamtz said “the ’40 Act framework – the regulatory structure under which the existing Truth Social Funds suite operates – provides enhanced investor protections, greater operational flexibility, and access to a broader range of institutional distribution channels.” Yorkville America said the structure includes board oversight, audits, fiduciary standards, broader access across brokerage and retirement platforms, improved tax efficiency, regular SEC disclosures and a regulatory framework used by U.S. investment companies for more than 80 years.
Bloomberg Research Analyst James Seyffart questioned Yorkville America’s explanation, saying the stated reasoning “doesn’t make a ton of sense” because differences between a ’33 Act exchange-traded product and a ’40 Act ETF were already widely understood. Seyffart said the withdrawal was more likely tied to rising competition in the spot Bitcoin ETF market.
Morgan Stanley launched MSBT in April with a 14-basis-point fee. MSBT had accumulated $266.72 million in total net assets and carried a 0.14% annual expense ratio, compared with 15 basis points for Grayscale’s Bitcoin Mini Trust and 25 basis points for both BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust and Fidelity’s Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund.
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs had attracted $57.4 billion in cumulative inflows since SEC approval in January 2024. The withdrawal came during a weaker stretch for the category, with spot Bitcoin ETFs losing roughly $1 billion last week and almost $980 million more during the first two days of the current week.
The ETF filings were part of a wider group of Trump-linked crypto ventures that also included Trump-themed NFT collections, the TRUMP meme coin and World Liberty Financial. House Judiciary Democrats previously accused the White House of operating “the world’s most corrupt crypto startup operation,” while Democratic senators last week sought amendments to a crypto market structure bill that included attempts to limit crypto-related ventures linked to the president and his family.
We’ve launched the all-new COIN360 Perp DEX, built for traders who move fast!
Trade 130+ assets with up to 100× leverage, enjoy instant order placement and low-slippage swaps, and earn USDC passive yield while climbing the leaderboard. Your trades deserve more than speed — they deserve mastery.
Executive Order Targets Fintech and Crypto Payment Access
President Donald Trump signed a May 19 executive order directing federal financial regulators to review and update rules for integrating digital assets and fintech into traditional financial services and payment systems. The order says “The Federal Government must update regulations to allow integration of digital assets and innovative technology into traditional financial services and payment systems.”
The order targets “overly burdensome and fragmented regulations and supervisory practices that form barriers to entry and primarily benefit incumbent financial services firms.” Federal regulators have 90 days to identify regulations, guidance, supervisory practices and application processes that impede fintech partnerships with federally regulated institutions.
Agency heads then have 180 days to act on the findings in coordination with the White House Assistant for Economic Policy. The review covers the SEC, CFTC, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, FDIC, OCC and National Credit Union Administration.
The review must address barriers to bank charters, credit union charters, deposit insurance, licenses and other approvals for eligible fintech firms. The order keeps safety, soundness, consumer protection and market integrity as stated guardrails.
The Federal Reserve must complete a parallel review within 120 days on whether it has legal authority to grant uninsured depositories and non-bank financial companies, including digital asset firms, direct access to Federal Reserve payment accounts and Reserve Bank payment services. The order also asks whether individual Federal Reserve Banks can act independently on applications for payment access.
Where existing law permits expanded access, the Fed is asked to publish transparent application procedures. Complete applications would then need to receive a decision within 90 days. Master accounts are Federal Reserve accounts that let eligible institutions settle payments directly through the central bank instead of relying on another bank to move money through the U.S. financial system.
Luke Nolan, senior researcher at CoinShares, said the order preserves formal Fed independence because it asks for a review rather than forcing access. “Final authority on master account access still sits with the Fed, and the Executive Order doesn’t change that,” Nolan said.
Nolan said the pressure on the Fed is “somewhat real” but works through optics rather than legal force because a public report deadline means any denial now has to be defended publicly. He said the precedent matters more than immediate legal impact, calling the White House’s public role in a supervisory and risk-management decision “certainly different to what we are used to.” Without looser Fed risk standards, Nolan said, the order is “largely political messaging.”
Wesley Rios, U.S. and partnerships lead at Morph, said the order places Fed access “formally on the table,” but any real path for crypto firms still depends on whether the Fed changes its access standards and finds “enough legal clarity” for nonbank firms.
Dan Dadybayo, strategy lead at Horizontal Systems, said the order could “indirectly accelerate tokenization” by creating “a much smoother path for tokenized assets to interact with traditional markets.” Dadybayo said platforms focused on tokenized treasuries, securities and settlement infrastructure could “benefit disproportionately” if fintech-payment links become easier.
Dadybayo said, “For most of crypto’s history, the industry built systems outside traditional financial infrastructure.” He described the review as a possible shift from “crypto outside the system to crypto inside the rails.”
Ari Redbord, Global Head of Policy and Government Affairs at TRM Labs, called the order a “concrete step” toward putting the U.S. at the forefront of digital asset adoption. Redbord described digital asset dominance as an “American strategic interest,” citing stablecoins’ $33 trillion in 2025 transaction volume and market capitalization exceeding $300 billion.
Custodia Bank founder Caitlin Long welcomed the directive after arguing that the Federal Reserve had blocked legally eligible institutions from the U.S. payment system. Custodia lost a 2023 court fight for master account approval.
The Federal Reserve had already begun limited crypto access before the new order. The Kansas City Fed approved a “limited purpose account” for Payward, Kraken’s parent company, in March 2026, following the Fed board’s earlier discussion of “skinny” master accounts for select firms.
Crypto companies including Coinbase, Circle, Ripple, Paxos, Stripe-owned Bridge and Crypto.com have received conditional approval for national trust bank charters from the OCC. Those approvals allow some bank-like services such as federally regulated digital asset custody, staking and trade settlement.
Senator Elizabeth Warren argued in a letter to the OCC that those approvals violated the National Bank Act and posed “serious risks” to the safety of the U.S. banking system. World Liberty Financial also has a pending application, and Warren has urged Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould to reject or review it while describing the Trump-linked DeFi firm as being “at the center of perhaps the most disgraceful Presidential corruption scandal in U.S. history.”
FAQ
Why were the Truth Social crypto ETF filings withdrawn?
Yorkville America said it now plans to pursue products under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Which Truth Social ETF filings were pulled?
The Bitcoin ETF, Bitcoin & Ethereum ETF and Crypto Blue Chip ETF filings were withdrawn.
What does Trump’s executive order require?
It requires regulators to review fintech and crypto barriers across traditional financial services and payment systems.
Does the order force the Fed to grant master accounts?
No. Luke Nolan said final authority still sits with the Fed.
This article has been refined and enhanced by ChatGPT.